That still doesn't give you any kind of authority to go ahead and punish a player who might be innocent.
It doesn't matter whether anyone involved broke any rules, that isn't the point, the point is that @Admin has the numbers needed to resolve the dispute with complete certainty as to who is guilty, allowing him to then take the actions needed to resolve the issue.
On top of this, you are keeping the ways how you will "sanction" the guilty player confidential. I mentioned this in my last post, but you didn't respond to it.
If you sanction @lucius or @MDND, you would be making this situation even worse than it already is.
Well we know that MDND transfered the land from the retail store after Lucius made him director, they are supposed to own it 50% each, but MDND just took the land and made a new retail store.
Well we know that MDND transfered the land from the retail store after Lucius made him director, they are supposed to own it 50% each, but MDND just took the land and made a new retail store.
but i thought you though that you though that i though that you are thinking that you though about thinking about thinking but you though that you think that you though about thinking but thinking abut thinking is about how you though,
