In particular, I am looking at amazon prime.
Is lucius allowed to take money out of the company in a way that does not benefit the shareholders (so not as dividends), and would that violate the "IPO companies must work for the benefit of the shareholders" rule?
Furthermore, what happens in the event that all assets are sold to another company lucius would own for less than its worth, would that also violate the rule? Should all decisions be explained by IPO companies rather than looking through the history and wondering why a company sold assets to another for 0 and got some back and a complete mess of confusion?
I am not saying lucius would do that, I am just curious as to what would happen for other companies as well and just using amazon prime as an example.
